The Slippery Slope: Government Intervention and the Threat to Free Market Principles

Policymakers on both sides of the aisle are increasingly seeking government intervention as a “solution” for what they perceive to be market “failures.” This trend poses a significant threat to the free-market system that has served as the bedrock of America’s economic success. Recent actions, such as California’s pig regulations impacting pork production nationwide to the creation of a state patchwork of minimum wage laws that impact business operations and the price of goods and services in many states, showcase the far-reaching and unintended consequences of government intrusion.

A recent proposal in Florida to create a state-run “Sunshine State Freedom Bank” serves as a reminder that this concerning shift towards government micromanagement has made its way to the financial sector – and consumers will be the ones to pay the price in the form of:

1. Taxpayers footing the bill. The feasibility study itself will require funding, and the establishment of the bank will involve significant startup costs. These costs will ultimately be borne by taxpayers, and there is no guarantee that the bank will be successful or provide the promised benefits.
2. Greater instability and risk. Concentrating a larger amount of public funds and taxpayer dollars in single institution increases the risk of instability and widespread repercussions for the economy and hardworking families across the state.
3. Fewer choices and higher costs. A state-run bank could potentially crowd out private banks that currently employ tens of thousands of Florida residents and serve millions of Floridians. This could lead to fewer choices for consumers and potentially higher costs for banking services.
4. Ideological bias and political interference. A state bank driven by political motivations could undermine the stability and neutrality of the financial system. It could lead to decisions that prioritize political goals over financial health, which could have broader economic implications and potentially put Floridians’ money at risk.

Unfortunately, this proposal is not an isolated incident, but a part of the broader pattern we are seeing emerge on both sides of the political spectrum. For example, there have also been efforts to introduce postal banking legislation, which would give the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) the ability to offer financial services, another attempt at tipping the scales in favor of government micromanagement over proven free market solutions in the financial sector. 

Unfortunately, both traditionally red and blue states have shown a growing tendency to advocate for politicized solutions to perceived challenges in the economic sector, particularly within the banking industry. And what’s worse: Americans are not asking for this. In fact, these efforts come at a time when eight in ten Americans trust their bank more than the government. These initiatives represent a dangerous departure from the free enterprise ideals that have historically driven innovation, competition and prosperity, and voters should rightfully be leery of any proposal that advocates for bigger government and more risk to taxpayers.

A markets-driven solution

Rather than continue down the slippery slope of using increased government control as the solution to every alleged market inefficiency, state leaders need to trust in the power of free markets to self-correct and drive progress, as they have consistently done throughout our nation’s history and that we all benefit from, such as technological developments, the growth of the internet and telecommunications, entertainment, and more. It’s time to implement practices and policies that protect consumers.

The preservation of America’s economic freedom hinges on our ability to recognize and oppose these incremental steps toward greater government intervention across the nation. Anytime the government engages in social engineering, the market loses. It’s important that we continue to support policies that empower both businesses and consumers.

###